A hardy “in the morning” to all you comic fans out there. That’s right, it’s morning here where I am…too morningish if you know what I mean. But deadlines and all that. Welcome to Comic Polity, the column that ties together the psuedo-political issues ofthe day and your favorite comics. Who came up with this cockamamie idea…it’s important not to point fingers and name names here, so we’re going to leave it at that. *cough, cough* Marvel 616 Politics *cough, cough*
I was hesitant to pick up a book that was not my standard 616 Marvel U, but I thought I would get in early on this Bendis series. In the past I had missed the jumping on points of Powers, so I thought I would pick up this work early. The series is currently on issue four.
As I read this book it became increasingly clear to me that the work was developed to make a statement. Whether that be anti-establishment or revolution or simply a “what if” scenario I’m still not certain. Yet, the work of fiction is important enough to warrant more than just a cursory glance.
Wikipedia defines the work as a “series is about a young woman named Scarlet Rue from Portland who rebels against a corrupt society and ends up starting a new American revolution in the process.” Although the book has not taken itself in this direction completely, the summary seems accurate enough.
The truly interesting thing about the book to me is current political climate, not the book itself. Don’t get me wrong, it is a fine work of fiction; however, the arrow comes a bit too close to the mark for my taste. In the book Scarlet takes revenge on a dirty cop that killed her friend. She then works her way up the chain making violent statements to those that either turned a blind eye or empowered the corrupt system. Soon the rebel gathers public support.
It’s interesting to note that the book takes place in a time where States Rights are a hot topic as well as the “Tea Party‘s” age-old call against taxation without representation. Now most of my interactions with the Marvel writers, artists, and editors lead me to believe that as a whole the crowd can be labeled as Liberal on the right/left wing scale that we all live and die by. And if Bendis fits that mold, then that would explain the “power to the people” feel of the book. However, most Liberals are supporters of the government’s provisions for the people, which would fly counter to revolution.
What to take away here is not the political views of the creators of the book, but rather ideas that the book gives the reader. (You all saw Inception, right?) What are we being told, besides a good story?
Scarlet is not about large scale revolution (yet), but about revolt. It is about standing up for what is right even if it means crossing the line of the law. But this can only end badly. As the supporting characters tell her in the latest issue, this will only end with her being shot, as all revolts do.
The deeper question here is “when?” There will always be corruption; there will always be injustice. There will always be wrongs that need to be righted, regardless of your political views. The question is when will you stand up against the flow of power? When will it be needed? And when will it be too late?
Bendis and Maleev explore the adversity and support of a character taking such a stand.
I don’t know how it will end for Scarlet, but I do know that the political message in this book could be controversial, if it is paid attention to. What do you think? Where do you stand? Are we doing fine? Does this apply to only local government? Is this story only about a police-state or is it about all government?
Chime in, and get Comic Booked!