“No One Dies Part Two: Resolve”
Storytellers: Dan Slott & Marcos Martin
Colors: Muntsa Vicente
- The standoff continues from the end of last issue.
- Spider-Man arrives and, owing to a lack of spider-sense, takes a bullet when Massacre opens fire and subsequently escapes.
- Jonah holds a press conference, after which he speaks with the young son of one of Massacre’s victims and vows that there will be “zero tolerance for murderers”.
- Following a brief origin story, Massacre resurfaces with more hostages. Jonah rather explicitly tells the police chief that he wants Massacre dead.
- Spider-Man arrives on the scene with a bulletproof costume and a batch of magnetic webbing, which he uses to block the radio frequencies used by Massacre’s detonators.
- After he has been disarmed and beaten by Spider-Man, the police snipers finally get a bead on Massacre. When the chief orders them to take the shot, Spider-Man shoves Massacre out of the way.
- The issue closes with a brief confrontation between Spidey and Jonah, illustrating the clash between their respective mindsets.
- I’ll just get this out of the way up front. Marcos Martin. Really, I should just copy and paste this into the review for any issue he pencils in the future.
- I’ll get into it in more depth later, but I dig the contrast between Peter and Jonah and how they’re each reacting to Marla’s death.
- The magnetic webbing was good and clever. I love it when Spidey turns to his scientific acumen to save the day. To me, that’s something that has always set him apart (Reed Richards and Tony Stark notwithstanding).
- On a less analytical level, I loved Jonah’s line at the end, when he decides that Spider-Man is neither threat nor menace, but rather “a @#%* idiot”.
- I was a bit uncomfortable with the idea of Jonah essentially using the NYPD as a hit squad. I don’t intend to debate the political or ethical ramifications; I just wasn’t entirely comfortable with it, even as a story point.
- Now for a continuity nitpick. Spidey and the police lose track of Massacre after the initial standoff because in his haste Peter forgot that he uses his spider-sense to keep tabs on spider tracers. However, in the earliest (Lee/Ditko) issues in which the tracers appear, he instead used a “small portable receiver”. At the risk of sounding like an editor’s caption, see ASM #11. Granted that has long since been abandoned, but the point is that the tracers are still
- This issue marks the introduction of the second new costume in three story arcs. While I am a fan of Spidey breaking out the science when the situation calls for it, I hope Slott doesn’t overdue the “new costume” gimmick, lest we end up with a plethora of costumes that are only used in one or two issues. Spider-Armor anyone?
- I felt like Slott was beating us over the head with “oops, no more spider-sense” moments. First, the web swinging gaff, then he gets shot, then he forgets that he uses his spider-sense to follow tracers. I understand that the idea was to illustrate how much he depends on that particular power, often without realizing it, but all three of those incidents occur within the space of six pages. That’s a bit much.
Going into this issue, the biggest question was how it would compare to ASM #655. While this is natural, it’s also unfair. While neither is bad, they are both very different issues. Whereas #655 was largely rooted in character study, #656 is by contrast more along the lines of a standard superhero comic. However, that doesn’t mean there’s no character work being done. Indeed, what this issue serves to showcase is just how Jonah and Peter are handling Marla’s death. In particular, both of them are acting rather irrationally, but in their own ways.
Peter’s response has been summed up by the very title of this story, “No One Dies”. Setting aside the naiveté inherent in assuming that he can, in fact save everyone, this has essentially been his goal all along. Regardless, this is pretty much in line with Peter’s character. Any self-respecting Spider-Man fan knows that if there’s a way, however illogical, for Peter to blame himself he will. And hyperbole aside, he’s basically reacting to a death he (for whatever the reason) failed to prevent by vowing not to let such a thing happen again.
Jonah, by contrast, has always been a more reactionary character, and that tendency is in full swing here. First demanding that Smythe receive the death penalty and later giving the order to kill Massacre, Jonah is apparently allowing his anger and grief influence his judgment, something that will undoubtedly have significant consequences for him if he allows it to continue.
Of particular note, however, is the fact that Peter and Jonah have such opposite reactions. Indeed, while Peter vows to save every life possible, Jonah has focused instead on retribution, both in regard to Smythe and in ordering Massacre’s death after a standoff in which he killed eight people. Hopefully, the repercussions of their mutual irrationalities will be further explored in the months to come.